Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Lunix Network tuning between SuSE versions

Hybrid View

  1. #1

    Lunix Network tuning between SuSE versions

    We have a SLES 11.2 box and another box running SLES 11.1 here in Akron.

    We have a box in Luxembourg running SLES 11.1 and another running 11.2 (was a SLES 10.2 machine but has been temporarily replaced with the 11.2 one).

    I can transfer files from Lux to Akron from either of the Lux machines to either of the Akron machines and I get nearly the full capability of the pipe (100 Mbps).

    But I can't transfer the same files from Akron to Lux at that same speed.

    Specifically,

    Akron 11.2 to Lux 11.2 = 74 Mpbs
    Akron 11.2 to Lux 11.1 = 50 Mpbs

    Akron 11.1 to Lux 11.2 = 27 Mpbs
    Akron 11.1 to Lux 11.1 = 37 Mpbs

    All Lux to Akron combinations get > 85 Mbps consistently. We really need all these combinations to work properly both directions.

    I have looked at all parameters the internet says matters to transfer performance, but to no avail.

    I don't know if this is a sending limitation or a receiving problem. Our network guys say the pipe itself is fine.

    So anyone have ideas of what to set on which machine to bring the rate from Akron to Lux up?

    Thanks for any info.

    Tom

    PS: Akron 11.2 = 3.0.13-0.27-default kernal
    11.1 = 2.6.32.12-0.7-default

    Lux 11.1 = 2.6.32.24-0.2-default
    11.2 = 3.0.34-0.7-default

  2. #2
    ab NNTP User

    Re: Lunix Network tuning between SuSE versions

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1

    Transfer them how? Have you tried other sources/destinations at the
    same sites? At different sites?

    Good luck.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux)
    Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

    iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQIri8AAoJEF+XTK08PnB5EA4P/3xyT4BqAcVkoGbQLNXcG19v
    p7yKHD2pxe5wmcWcwyB4pxdrbcEp07lRKqMZNx3ZUZlQqLwVg0 CAu9sQsXPZ+7Dz
    Myf4tomw+CSGWKUUjy5YMINPyCObZIp7hD8mesA5mf5my+WRO8 0nu5zronvmYz8r
    gi2lfaW+CMyHPBdjb06ReWWzQUpcGUkbmp7ObPLfT2rFGJYSCx RAf++WqkMIuYe2
    HpDextxxk3d6YWr0wQwaJO2sM+EcHC1E4GMNC6ueI8OkbKHTSu dT9PpCXsTA/pDz
    Ik0IXrMSW2KIUOXPN2YLnze6PEqs+63EdKtpSrcNzxqHZ0pKRM sQW7GPwmFWxKuk
    r9wKjt5x8e7gxvgFWy+/lGjAob9HAifCKxUe4iHFT/6v0WaH6subaxL85vAMYlRt
    /3TvZ3KrO2JRFdepYB9g5CO71Y4j7uM9kY9ieQXRNAyKlXm5WGY xY6auDBszwcT+
    y5uqwOsXGzfRUmH5D7pYH/WSp+Hrko11HzLGsFqlwOWB+cijPtmbP5Hcd6eZ5+6F
    wAve7OXgqLYUUM2Yy76n83MTTAjzn2LouCtmsOx83Qn08fsCKS yv7exeCPp7vsoO
    zIx/CiDvyd5RTnEAuSk0uWetyeSRwzNjhoEOaReZjK40cJ8BdXeCsq QEaP/FP2ls
    h3FOXBLmxQJxhooCghx+
    =40yq
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

  3. #3

    Re: Lunix Network tuning between SuSE versions

    we have this fast connection only to these 4 boxes.
    so i can't go to any other boxes...

  4. Re: Lunix Network tuning between SuSE versions

    Quote Originally Posted by twurgler
    we have this fast connection only to these 4 boxes.
    so i can't go to any other boxes...

    Hi
    Are all the network interfaces using the exact same device driver? On
    each system post the output from (Please use code tags for the output);

    Code:
    ethtool ethX
    hwinfo --netcard
    Are they all going through the same switches on the routes to/from the
    locations?

    --
    Cheers Malcolm °¿° (Linux Counter #276890)
    SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 11 (x86_64) Kernel 3.0.34-0.7-default
    up 10 days 16:44, 2 users, load average: 0.45, 0.36, 0.36
    CPU Intel i5 CPU M520@2.40GHz | Intel Arrandale GPU


  5. #5

    Re: Lunix Network tuning between SuSE versions

    reread your note.

    I was using scp. this does work fast from Lux to here. but then started using
    rsync --compress --rsh=rsh ......

    this is faster, but still faster from Lux than to Lux.

  6. Re: Lunix Network tuning between SuSE versions

    Hi Tom,

    to rule out session initiation problems: are those transfers of sufficiently large files, taking more than a few seconds? (I'm thinking of delays when i.e. the Lux receiver host waits while unsuccessfully trying to resolve the DNS name of the remote host.)

    Another probable cause might be differences in TCP window sizes or in max IP packet sizes - those would be things that the networkers might be able to check.

    If the transfer takes long enough (minutes?) it might be interesting to monitor the bandwidth use across the whole copy process - i.e. do you ever get the same max load as in the other direction? Do you get a constant load or is something "stepping on the link" during the transfer? One more thing to check is the actual load on the link - is it fully loaded, despite the slow netto speed seen with the transfer?

    A last thing that comes to mind is actual asymmetric bandwidth at the link level: If (for whatever reason) the available bandwidth towards Lux is lower than when sending from Lux, then you'd see this type of behaviour, too.

    Regards,
    Jens

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Wescosville, Pa, USA, North America, Earth, Sol, Gould Belt, Orion-Cygnus Arm, The Milky Way, ...
    Posts
    33

    Re: Lunix Network tuning between SuSE versions

    Toss wireshark on ( any of these boxes ) and do your transfer. You can deduce which is slow, how big the window size is, fragmentation, ..... and "all parameters the internet says matters to transfer performance." You may find retransmissions, or whatever. Some times the issue will be in the poor selection of MTU's, which can be an issue with ICMP is filtered. But thats the first step... observe what is actually happening on the wire.

    -- Bob

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •