# RIP: NetWare

**URL:** https://forums.suse.com/t/rip-netware/25548
**Category:** Chatting over the Back Fence
**Created:** [May 8, 2014, 4:16pm UTC](https://forums.suse.com/t/rip-netware/25548 "2014-05-08T16:16:01Z")
**Posts on this page:** 20
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![System1](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/51bf81/32.png) [@System1](https://forums.suse.com/u/System1)
#### Post date: [May 8, 2014, 4:16pm UTC](https://forums.suse.com/t/rip-netware/25548/1 "2014-05-08T16:16:01Z")

</div>

Hi all

This afternoon we will shut down our NetWare server.

It is like reaching the last page of a very thick book. I’ve been with  
NetWare since version 2.0a in 1988 where ArcNet was used side by side  
with Token-Ring and Ethernet. My first installation used Unisys  
workstations with Intel 286 CPUs and Connect ArcNet cards. One  
workstation with an extra 1 MB ram was also the server - hardware was  
expensive those days. It ran for many years.

Then was NetWare 3.12 and then 4.11 which ran our first corporate server  
in 1993 on a 486 home-built Micron server with 32 MB ram, later replaced  
with an HP server with 80 MB ram. However, the old server was not  
trashed but sold as second hand and served four POS systems until late  
2010(!). The power supply broke down once and was replaced in three  
hours for about $100, and the 2 GB SCSI harddisk was replaced in 2003,  
those were the only errors experienced. How many systems live for 17  
years?

In 2004 our HP server was replaced with NetWare 6.5 Small Business  
Server on an IBM server. This is the installation which has run until  
this day for 9Â½ years, though the server was replaced 8 years ago.

Three years ago it was clear that NetWare has no future despite its  
extreme reliability, so I started migrating this single server to  
Windows file and print servers and Active Directory. Still, the NetWare  
server ran GroupWise for e-mail and Apache for our web server.

Three months ago I finally had all mail transferred to Office 365  
(later, perhaps, an in-house Exchange server) and yesterday the last  
service, our web site, was moved to our new Fujitsu TX140 server running  
Windows Server 2012 R2 which also hosts two VMs.

The Internet killed NetWare. It used the IPX/SPX protocols while  
everything should run TCP/IP. Microsoft was quite fast to adopt where  
Novell was not so fast, and TCP/IP always has been felt like an add-on  
as it was not native to the core of NetWare - administration of a  
NetWare server has always been a bit of a challenge. I never learned  
NW6.5 well - it was a job for specialists who we employed.

So … the boss (Rita, my wife) has been appointed - for the first and  
last time - to face the console at 15:00 UTC to type shutdown at the  
command prompt and press enter, closing the Novell book.

Gustav  
Cactus Data ApS

## – cactusdata

cactusdata’s Profile: [https://forums.novell.com/member.php?userid=75481](https://forums.novell.com/member.php?userid=75481)  
View this thread: [https://forums.novell.com/showthread.php?t=476855](https://forums.novell.com/showthread.php?t=476855)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![kgroneman](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/f1d935/32.png) [@kgroneman](https://forums.suse.com/u/kgroneman)
#### Post date: [May 8, 2014, 4:36pm UTC](https://forums.suse.com/t/rip-netware/25548/2 "2014-05-08T16:36:01Z")

</div>

Too bad you moved to an MS solution instead of OES/GW.

–  
Kim - 5/8/2014 7:35:34 AM

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![system](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex022/uploads/suse/original/2X/5/5012ba89e3ffb5220dac47d5ea0ba032e2fe1cb6.png) [@system](https://forums.suse.com/u/system)
#### Post date: [May 8, 2014, 4:42pm UTC](https://forums.suse.com/t/rip-netware/25548/3 "2014-05-08T16:42:34Z")

</div>

RIP indeed, sounds like quite a run there. Similar to Mr. Groneman,  
too bad the sles/oes option wasn’t looked at there.

–  
Stevo

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![system](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex022/uploads/suse/original/2X/5/5012ba89e3ffb5220dac47d5ea0ba032e2fe1cb6.png) [@system](https://forums.suse.com/u/system)
#### Post date: [May 8, 2014, 5:38pm UTC](https://forums.suse.com/t/rip-netware/25548/4 "2014-05-08T17:38:45Z")

</div>

On 08/05/2014 14:42, Stevo wrote:  
[color=blue]

> RIP indeed[/color]

## Poor SAP …

Simon  
Novell Knowledge Partner

* * *

## If you find this post helpful and are logged into the web interface, please show your appreciation and click on the star below. Thanks.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![system](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex022/uploads/suse/original/2X/5/5012ba89e3ffb5220dac47d5ea0ba032e2fe1cb6.png) [@system](https://forums.suse.com/u/system)
#### Post date: [May 8, 2014, 9:29pm UTC](https://forums.suse.com/t/rip-netware/25548/5 "2014-05-08T21:29:53Z")

</div>

cactusdata wrote:  
[color=blue]

> Three years ago it was clear that NetWare has no future despite its  
> extreme reliability, so I started migrating this single server to  
> Windows file and print servers and Active Directory. Still, the  
> NetWare server ran GroupWise for e-mail and Apache for our web server.
> 
> Three months ago I finally had all mail transferred to Office 365  
> (later, perhaps, an in-house Exchange server) and yesterday the last  
> service, our web site, was moved to our new Fujitsu TX140 server  
> running Windows Server 2012 R2 which also hosts two VMs.[/color]

As others have pointed out… I’m not really sure why this was all  
moved to Microsoft. Correct, NetWare hasn’t had a future in a long  
time, but all those Novell services have lived on and greatly enhanced  
in OES. And as to GroupWise, even if there was a desire to move off of  
NetWare and not consider Linux, GroupWise runs perfectly fine on  
Windows with many customers running it on Windows and in fact GroupWise  
2014 supports Active Directory natively.

I’m always confounded when moving off of NetWare is equated to moving  
off of Novell.

–  
Does this washcloth smell like chloroform?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![system](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex022/uploads/suse/original/2X/5/5012ba89e3ffb5220dac47d5ea0ba032e2fe1cb6.png) [@system](https://forums.suse.com/u/system)
#### Post date: [May 8, 2014, 9:31pm UTC](https://forums.suse.com/t/rip-netware/25548/6 "2014-05-08T21:31:32Z")

</div>

Joseph Marton sounds like they ‘said’:  
[color=blue]

> I’m always confounded when moving off of NetWare is equated to moving  
> off of Novell.[/color]

So my response to Joseph’s comment is…

I’m wishing Netware would have never gone away.

–  
Stevo

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![system](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex022/uploads/suse/original/2X/5/5012ba89e3ffb5220dac47d5ea0ba032e2fe1cb6.png) [@system](https://forums.suse.com/u/system)
#### Post date: [May 8, 2014, 10:48pm UTC](https://forums.suse.com/t/rip-netware/25548/7 "2014-05-08T22:48:46Z")

</div>

On 5/8/2014 2:31 PM, Stevo wrote:[color=blue]

> Joseph Marton sounds like they ‘said’:  
> [color=green]
> 
> > I’m always confounded when moving off of NetWare is equated to moving  
> > off of Novell.[/color]
> 
> So my response to Joseph’s comment is…
> 
> I’m wishing Netware would have never gone away.  
> [/color]  
> Still got 6.5 with BoarderManager running here. Purring like a kitten  
> for years, and years, and years, …

Bob

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![system](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex022/uploads/suse/original/2X/5/5012ba89e3ffb5220dac47d5ea0ba032e2fe1cb6.png) [@system](https://forums.suse.com/u/system)
#### Post date: [May 8, 2014, 11:05pm UTC](https://forums.suse.com/t/rip-netware/25548/8 "2014-05-08T23:05:33Z")

</div>

Bob,[color=blue][color=green][color=darkred]

> > > I’m always confounded when moving off of NetWare is equated to moving  
> > > off of Novell.[/color]
> > 
> > So my response to Joseph’s comment is…
> > 
> > I’m wishing Netware would have never gone away.  
> > [/color]  
> > Still got 6.5 with BoarderManager running here. Purring like a kitten  
> > for years, and years, and years, …  
> > [/color]

A few months back I retired a NetWare server that had been running  
iFolder 2.1 for 300+ people since 2002. Someone said “It must really be  
a relief to get rid of that old thing.” I said “Why would I be relieved  
to retire a system that, for more than ten years, functioned exactly as  
intended, without needing monthly patches or weekly reboots… and  
without a single unplanned outage?”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![system](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex022/uploads/suse/original/2X/5/5012ba89e3ffb5220dac47d5ea0ba032e2fe1cb6.png) [@system](https://forums.suse.com/u/system)
#### Post date: [May 8, 2014, 11:35pm UTC](https://forums.suse.com/t/rip-netware/25548/9 "2014-05-08T23:35:05Z")

</div>

While most folks do often equate Novell with NetWare as one and the  
same. I met someone a few years back who equated Novell with Arcnet and  
was curious if we know made ethernet cards. I found that one amusing.  
I explained we were actually distributed a major and probably the best  
Linux Distro around.  
[color=blue]

> I’m always confounded when moving off of NetWare is equated to moving  
> off of Novell.[/color]

–  
Craig Wilson - MCNE, MCSE, CCNA  
Novell Technical Support Engineer

Novell does not officially monitor these forums.

Suggestions/Opinions/Statements made by me are solely my own.  
These thoughts may not be shared by either Novell or any rational human.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![system](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex022/uploads/suse/original/2X/5/5012ba89e3ffb5220dac47d5ea0ba032e2fe1cb6.png) [@system](https://forums.suse.com/u/system)
#### Post date: [May 9, 2014, 6:47am UTC](https://forums.suse.com/t/rip-netware/25548/10 "2014-05-09T06:47:12Z")

</div>

On 5/8/2014 4:05 PM, Black, Douglas wrote:[color=blue]

> Bob,[color=green][color=darkred]
> 
> > > > I’m always confounded when moving off of NetWare is equated to moving  
> > > > off of Novell.
> > > 
> > > So my response to Joseph’s comment is…
> > > 
> > > I’m wishing Netware would have never gone away.  
> > > [/color]  
> > > Still got 6.5 with BoarderManager running here. Purring like a kitten  
> > > for years, and years, and years, …  
> > > [/color]
> 
> A few months back I retired a NetWare server that had been running  
> iFolder 2.1 for 300+ people since 2002. Someone said “It must really be  
> a relief to get rid of that old thing.” I said “Why would I be relieved  
> to retire a system that, for more than ten years, functioned exactly as  
> intended, without needing monthly patches or weekly reboots… and  
> without a single unplanned outage?”
> 
> [/color]  
> AMEN

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![system](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex022/uploads/suse/original/2X/5/5012ba89e3ffb5220dac47d5ea0ba032e2fe1cb6.png) [@system](https://forums.suse.com/u/system)
#### Post date: [May 9, 2014, 10:10am UTC](https://forums.suse.com/t/rip-netware/25548/11 "2014-05-09T10:10:02Z")

</div>

Bob,[color=blue]

> Still got 6.5 with BoarderManager running here. Purring like a kitten  
> for years, and years, and years, …[/color]

Ditto, plus a bunch of OES

–  
Anders Gustafsson (NKP)  
The Aaland Islands (N60 E20)

Have an idea for a product enhancement? Please visit:  
[http://www.novell.com/rms](http://www.novell.com/rms)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![system](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex022/uploads/suse/original/2X/5/5012ba89e3ffb5220dac47d5ea0ba032e2fe1cb6.png) [@system](https://forums.suse.com/u/system)
#### Post date: [May 9, 2014, 1:16pm UTC](https://forums.suse.com/t/rip-netware/25548/12 "2014-05-09T13:16:02Z")

</div>

kgroneman;2318449 Wrote:[color=blue]

> Too bad you moved to an MS solution instead of OES/GW.[/color]

Two reasons. First, all our clients, one by one, left NetWare when  
servers were to be replaced. They asked for, well insisted on, Windows.  
At that time we had no clients with Linux servers (and still don’t  
have), so it just didn’t make sense to sport our own Linux server,  
Novell branded or not. Also, to be honest and I hate to mention it, but  
Windows servers have proven to be quite reliable. We still have clients  
running Windows Server 2000 with no updates, no reboots, just working,  
even at very low resources, and we can service them with out-of-the-box  
Remote Desktop Connection from any workstation.

Second, at the time to get a new file/print server we already had  
several Windows servers running for other tasks as well as an  
established Active Directory. Still, for months I checked out several  
other file servers like Solaris, OpenFiler, and Nexenta, but either they  
were a nightmare to manage or were severely limited in the OS editions  
or didn’t know of AD. As we are a small shop having a Microsoft Action  
Pack Subscription we had licenses for several servers. In one day I had  
set up two servers with DFS (full two-way file  
synchronisation/replication) as we have two locations and it just  
worked. Having more exiting things to do than experimenting with file  
servers, that was an EOD to me.

As for GroupWise, the situation is much the same. None of our clients  
run GW anymore, everyone is at Outlook, and from the clients running  
Office 365 we have only received positive feedback. So at least for an  
interim solution we moved our mail to Office 365. But my non-tech  
colleagues love it and I have to admit that it works very well, so most  
likely we will stick with this no-nonsense solution.

But no one knows the future. What are our options for running an  
in-house Novell server at zero license costs? Not a time limited  
evaluation license. I’m not updated with this, sorry

/gustav

## – cactusdata

cactusdata’s Profile: [https://forums.novell.com/member.php?userid=75481](https://forums.novell.com/member.php?userid=75481)  
View this thread: [https://forums.novell.com/showthread.php?t=476855](https://forums.novell.com/showthread.php?t=476855)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![system](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex022/uploads/suse/original/2X/5/5012ba89e3ffb5220dac47d5ea0ba032e2fe1cb6.png) [@system](https://forums.suse.com/u/system)
#### Post date: [May 9, 2014, 2:30pm UTC](https://forums.suse.com/t/rip-netware/25548/13 "2014-05-09T14:30:36Z")

</div>

cactusdata wrote:  
[color=blue]

> Two reasons. First, all our clients, one by one, left NetWare when  
> servers were to be replaced. They asked for, well insisted on,  
> Windows.[/color]

Were they aware of OES? Did you discuss OES with them?  
[color=blue]

> Also, to be honest and I hate to  
> mention it, but Windows servers have proven to be quite reliable.  
> We still have clients running Windows Server 2000 with no updates, no  
> reboots, just working, even at very low resources, and we can service  
> them with out-of-the-box Remote Desktop Connection from any  
> workstation.[/color]

Linux servers are just as reliable. It will be interesting to see if  
anyone chimes in with Linux server uptime examples.  
[color=blue]

> Second, at the time to get a new file/print server we already had  
> several Windows servers running for other tasks as well as an  
> established Active Directory.[/color]

Many Novell customers go with “best of breed” and as such run both  
Windows and OES side-by-side. Plus just about every Novell solution  
integrates with AD.  
[color=blue]

> Still, for months I checked out several  
> other file servers like Solaris, OpenFiler, and Nexenta, but either  
> they were a nightmare to manage or were severely limited in the OS  
> editions or didn’t know of AD.[/color]

OES is managed using many of the same tools as NetWare (e.g. iManager,  
ConsoleOne) making it a very easy transition. And it’s very aware of  
AD. Using Domain Services for Windows (an OES feature) it’s possible  
for an OES server to present itself as a Windows server providing an AD  
domain that workstations can join. In addition an upcoming release of  
OES will have a feature called “NSS for AD” which allows an OES server  
to join a domain so that AD users can natively be assigned trustee  
rights to NSS volumes.  
[color=blue]

> As we are a small shop having a  
> Microsoft Action Pack Subscription we had licenses for several  
> servers. In one day I had set up two servers with DFS (full two-way  
> file synchronisation/replication) as we have two locations and it just  
> worked. Having more exiting things to do than experimenting with file  
> servers, that was an EOD to me.[/color]

There’s no need to experiment with OES, and it’s very easy to deploy  
OES in a short amount of time. Otheres here can likely chime in with  
their experiences on how quickly it is to do this.  
[color=blue]

> As for GroupWise, the situation is much the same. None of our clients  
> run GW anymore, everyone is at Outlook,[/color]

Did you discuss keeping GW with them? What has been their pressing  
need for Outlook?  
[color=blue]

> and from the clients running  
> Office 365 we have only received positive feedback.[/color]

None have security concerns? None have concerns about Microsoft doing  
things such as modifying files synced between O365 and local PCs using  
OneDrive, including adding uniquely identifiable information to MS  
Office documents?

[http://www.myce.com/news/microsoft-onedrive-for-business-modifies-files-as-it-syncs-71168/](http://www.myce.com/news/microsoft-onedrive-for-business-modifies-files-as-it-syncs-71168/)  
[color=blue]

> But no one knows the future. What are our options for running an  
> in-house Novell server at zero license costs?[/color]

None of your Windows servers require licensing?

–  
Does this washcloth smell like chloroform?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![system](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex022/uploads/suse/original/2X/5/5012ba89e3ffb5220dac47d5ea0ba032e2fe1cb6.png) [@system](https://forums.suse.com/u/system)
#### Post date: [May 9, 2014, 2:36pm UTC](https://forums.suse.com/t/rip-netware/25548/14 "2014-05-09T14:36:24Z")

</div>

Joe,

On 09.05.2014 13:30, Joseph Marton wrote:[color=blue]

> None of your Windows servers require licensing?  
> [/color]

Not if you (illegally, I might add) use the action pack subscription for  
production servers. 😉

## CU,

Massimo Rosen  
Novell Knowledge Partner  
No emails please!  
[http://www.cfc-it.de](http://www.cfc-it.de)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![system](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex022/uploads/suse/original/2X/5/5012ba89e3ffb5220dac47d5ea0ba032e2fe1cb6.png) [@system](https://forums.suse.com/u/system)
#### Post date: [May 9, 2014, 4:16pm UTC](https://forums.suse.com/t/rip-netware/25548/15 "2014-05-09T16:16:01Z")

</div>

Thanks for commenting.

Yes, we discussed the possible Novell solutions with clients but it was  
up the hill. At some point you realize that time is too short. We were  
not on a mission and we didn’t have a battle to win, indeed not without  
Novell at our side - marketing support from Novell was nil. Also, I  
recall trouble obtaining the newest software from Novell for in-house  
use or licensed NFR. From your comment I understand this is still the  
case, and that is really a show-stopper. We don’t have funds for  
experimenting with software for which there is nearly zero demand.  
Again, that is sad situation given the NetWare records of the past, but  
nevertheless a fact.

The MAPS addresses exactly this. At a few hundred Euros it contains  
client and server licenses for 5/10 users for nearly all MS software  
relevant for small businesses, and as we do need the client licenses  
(Windows 8.x), the server licenses are effectively free to us as are 5  
licenses for Office 365 with E3 corporate licensing. It even comes with  
10 free priority support incidents, should you ever need it (we  
haven’t).

/gustav

## – cactusdata

cactusdata’s Profile: [https://forums.novell.com/member.php?userid=75481](https://forums.novell.com/member.php?userid=75481)  
View this thread: [https://forums.novell.com/showthread.php?t=476855](https://forums.novell.com/showthread.php?t=476855)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![system](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex022/uploads/suse/original/2X/5/5012ba89e3ffb5220dac47d5ea0ba032e2fe1cb6.png) [@system](https://forums.suse.com/u/system)
#### Post date: [May 9, 2014, 8:36pm UTC](https://forums.suse.com/t/rip-netware/25548/16 "2014-05-09T20:36:14Z")

</div>

Hi.

Let’s just get some facts straight…

On 09.05.2014 15:16, cactusdata wrote:[color=blue]

> Thanks for commenting.
> 
> Yes, we discussed the possible Novell solutions with clients but it was  
> up the hill. At some point you realize that time is too short. We were  
> not on a mission and we didn’t have a battle to win, indeed not without  
> Novell at our side - marketing support from Novell was nil. Also, I  
> recall trouble obtaining the newest software from Novell for in-house  
> use or licensed NFR. From your comment I understand this is still the  
> case, and that is really a show-stopper. We don’t have funds for  
> experimenting with software for which there is nearly zero demand.  
> Again, that is sad situation given the NetWare records of the past, but  
> nevertheless a fact.[/color]

_Production_ NFR licenses for all Novell products is and always was a  
non-issue for all registered Novell partners.  
[color=blue]

> The MAPS addresses exactly this. At a few hundred Euros it contains  
> client and server licenses for 5/10 users[/color]

_STRICTLY_ for temporary testing and demostration purposes only, and  
under no circumstances to be used for inhouse production. Please read  
the EULA for the Action Pack.  
[color=blue]

> for nearly all MS software  
> relevant for small businesses, and as we do need the client licenses  
> (Windows 8.x), the server licenses are effectively free to us as are 5  
> licenses for Office 365 with E3 corporate licensing. It even comes with  
> 10 free priority support incidents, should you ever need it (we  
> haven’t).[/color]

You are dead wrong, and have basically just publicy admitted you’re  
running your business on illegal microsoft software.

Not to mention that I totally fail to understand how this is relevant to  
you _customers_, which certainly can’t use an Action Pack, but have to  
pay for Microsofts Software. And since MS no longer offers anything  
compelling for small businesses (very much the opposite is true for  
Novell), I’m not quite sure where this discussion is based on. If you  
compare legal license costs between Microsoft and Novell for any  
business smaller than 200 users, Novell beats Microsoft so badly that  
you probably won’t even believe it.

Yes, they don’t market it. I give you that.

## CU,

Massimo Rosen  
Novell Knowledge Partner  
No emails please!  
[http://www.cfc-it.de](http://www.cfc-it.de)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![system](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex022/uploads/suse/original/2X/5/5012ba89e3ffb5220dac47d5ea0ba032e2fe1cb6.png) [@system](https://forums.suse.com/u/system)
#### Post date: [May 9, 2014, 9:56pm UTC](https://forums.suse.com/t/rip-netware/25548/17 "2014-05-09T21:56:01Z")

</div>

Well, I don’t know why, but you’ve got the MAPS completely wrong. The  
whole purpose with this is to provide an option for small shops to get  
familiar with the software by daily use.  
Thus is stated:

License table for Microsoft Action Pack partners  
Benefits include the latest internal-use software that you can use to  
run your business, sell your solutions, develop applications, and train  
your employees. These licenses must not be resold or used for direct  
revenue-generating activities, commercial purposes, personal purposes,  
or customer training.

On the contrary, at the partner resources page of Novell:

[http://support.novell.com/subscriptions/portal/spc](http://support.novell.com/subscriptions/portal/spc)

is still listed as I recalled it:

Registration Code and Use Restrictions  
Any product, registration codes, and associated software patches that  
you obtain via this Subscriber Portal may only be used for evaluation,  
testing, demonstration and development purposes; they may not be used in  
a production environment.

As I read it, that excludes regular daily use. thus you can not use it  
to run your business.  
Please - by all means - correct my if I’m wrong.

Your other comments are, of course, right except that you miss the  
point: Clients don’t know about or request Novell software, thus no  
business in this part of the World (Denmark) where we operate. Sorry.

/gustav

## – cactusdata

cactusdata’s Profile: [https://forums.novell.com/member.php?userid=75481](https://forums.novell.com/member.php?userid=75481)  
View this thread: [https://forums.novell.com/showthread.php?t=476855](https://forums.novell.com/showthread.php?t=476855)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![system](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex022/uploads/suse/original/2X/5/5012ba89e3ffb5220dac47d5ea0ba032e2fe1cb6.png) [@system](https://forums.suse.com/u/system)
#### Post date: [May 9, 2014, 10:14pm UTC](https://forums.suse.com/t/rip-netware/25548/18 "2014-05-09T22:14:34Z")

</div>

cactusdata wrote:  
[color=blue]

> Yes, we discussed the possible Novell solutions with clients but it  
> was up the hill. At some point you realize that time is too short. We  
> were not on a mission and we didn’t have a battle to win, indeed not  
> without Novell at our side - marketing support from Novell was nil.[/color]

That’s why we in Novell sales are here. We support both customers and  
partners and I help partners all the time. In addition to help from  
sales we have plenty of enablement tools in the PartnerNet program  
available to all partners.  
[color=blue]

> Also, I recall trouble obtaining the newest software from Novell for  
> in-house use or licensed NFR. From your comment I understand this is  
> still the case, and that is really a show-stopper.[/color]

That’s a perfect time to call the PartnerNet help desk as they should  
easily be able to help you obtain NFR licenses for any Novell product.  
[color=blue]

> We don’t have  
> funds for experimenting with software for which there is nearly zero  
> demand.[/color]

Hmm… not sure about the experimentation part, and in your previous  
post you mentioned experimenting with file servers such as Solaris,  
OpenFiler, and Nexenta. Talk about something with little demand. 🙂  
Well, I shouldn’t say that as I don’t know how much demand there is for  
those products but to say there is zero demand for Novell’s products is  
nowhere near accurate. In fact in Europe we’ve had quite a few great  
competitive wins recently as customers are ripping out Microsoft  
products and replacing them with Novell products: OES, GroupWise,  
ZENworks, and Vibe.  
[color=blue]

> The MAPS addresses exactly this.[/color]

I’m not familiar with MAPS, but sounds like from Massimo that it does  
not address this at all.  
[color=blue]

> At a few hundred Euros it contains  
> client and server licenses for 5/10 users for nearly all MS software  
> relevant for small businesses,[/color]

But since it’s only for partners it’s not a small business solution.  
As Massimo pointed out, Microsoft no longer has a small business  
solution other than Windows Server Essentials which is only for up to  
25 users and does not include any product other than Windows Server.  
With Novell Open Workgroup Suite Small Business Edition, customers with  
up to 200 users get OES, GroupWise, Vibe, ZENworks Configuration  
Management, ZENworks Endpoint Security Management, Filr, and iPrint  
Desktop all for a very low price, and if a customer owns any of these  
products they can purchase upgrade licenses to move into NOWS-SBE.  
I’ve been doing everything I can to get the word out on NOWS-SBE as  
it’s just an incredible offering and Microsoft does not come anywhere  
close. I’ve worked with a number of customers who recognized this and  
have moved into the suite as a result.

–  
Does this washcloth smell like chloroform?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![system](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex022/uploads/suse/original/2X/5/5012ba89e3ffb5220dac47d5ea0ba032e2fe1cb6.png) [@system](https://forums.suse.com/u/system)
#### Post date: [May 9, 2014, 10:59pm UTC](https://forums.suse.com/t/rip-netware/25548/19 "2014-05-09T22:59:40Z")

</div>

cactusdata wrote:  
[color=blue]

> On the contrary, at the partner resources page of Novell:
> 
> [http://support.novell.com/subscriptions/portal/spc](http://support.novell.com/subscriptions/portal/spc)
> 
> is still listed as I recalled it:
> 
> Registration Code and Use Restrictions  
> Any product, registration codes, and associated software patches that  
> you obtain via this Subscriber Portal may only be used for evaluation,  
> testing, demonstration and development purposes; they may not be used  
> in a production environment.[/color]

That’s for our various subscriptions such as the Professional Resource  
Suite. That’s available to everyone, not just partners, and is only  
for evaluation. You need to look at the partner benefits on ParterNet.

[https://www.partnernetprogram.com/secure/program/partner\_use/novell.html](https://www.partnernetprogram.com/secure/program/partner_use/novell.html)

Even at the basic silver level you are allowed to use up to 50 users of  
just about every Novell product internally.

–  
Does this washcloth smell like chloroform?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![system](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex022/uploads/suse/original/2X/5/5012ba89e3ffb5220dac47d5ea0ba032e2fe1cb6.png) [@system](https://forums.suse.com/u/system)
#### Post date: [May 10, 2014, 8:56pm UTC](https://forums.suse.com/t/rip-netware/25548/20 "2014-05-10T20:56:01Z")

</div>

jmarton;2318661 Wrote:[color=blue]

> cactusdata wrote:  
> That’s for our various subscriptions such as the Professional Resource  
> Suite. That’s available to everyone, not just partners, and is only  
> for evaluation. You need to look at the partner benefits on ParterNet.
> 
> [https://www.partnernetprogram.com/secure/program/partner\_use/novell.html](https://www.partnernetprogram.com/secure/program/partner_use/novell.html)
> 
> Even at the basic silver level you are allowed to use up to 50 users of  
> just about every Novell product internally.[/color]

Thanks, I sincerely tried but I need help.  
I go to:

[https://www.partnernetprogram.com/secure/program/partner\_use/novell.html](https://www.partnernetprogram.com/secure/program/partner_use/novell.html)

then pick Resources, Benefits and land here:

[https://www.partnernetprogram.com/program/benefits.html](https://www.partnernetprogram.com/program/benefits.html)

then under Technical Services Benefits pick Professional Ressource  
Kit-Partner and land here:

[http://support.novell.com/subscriptions/portal/spc](http://support.novell.com/subscriptions/portal/spc)

where I select Professional Resource Suite Electronic - Partner.  
Then I can pick Download Licenses and land at the page title (URL  
unchanged):  
[color=blue]

> Subscriber Portal  
> Download Benefit
> 
> Download licenses for Novell software. If you receive CDs/DVDs as part  
> of your subscription, you can download the same licenses from CD 1A  
> here. For subscriptions with expanded levels, you can download the  
> expanded licenses here.[/color]

But at the bottom it reads:[color=blue]

> Any product, registration codes, and associated software patches that  
> you obtain via this Subscriber Portal may only be used for evaluation,  
> testing, demonstration and development purposes; they may not be used in  
> a production environment.[/color]

The magic words seem to be:

For subscriptions with expanded levels, you can download the expanded  
licenses here.

But nothing about what expanded levels is and what products they  
include, nor which licenses are “expanded”.

How do I proceed, please?

/gustav

## – cactusdata

cactusdata’s Profile: [https://forums.novell.com/member.php?userid=75481](https://forums.novell.com/member.php?userid=75481)  
View this thread: [https://forums.novell.com/showthread.php?t=476855](https://forums.novell.com/showthread.php?t=476855)

[Next page](https://forums.suse.com/t/rip-netware/25548.md?page=2)
